All of my closing papers have the title company of Star Title company who acquired New Century Mortgage to handle my mortgage payments on my re-financed home. Well New Century Mortgage went belly-up and sold my loan to HomEq Servicing. For 4 years I have made payments to “HomEq Servicing, Inc. which reads a spill prior to every call, “We are not a mortgage company, we are a debt collector, simply attempting to collect a debt.” I recently read in the news that this happened to a couple and because of lack of proof from the lender, the judge relieved the couple of their balance owed on the home, demanded that the fraudulent lender pay back X-amount of years that they paid to the wrong company maybe? So, the couple were mortgage free with a little extra money in hand. Anybody else read that, or is this wishful thinking (dreaming) ?

 

The first mortgage bank faxed over an approval letter to our realtor approving the sale of our house and mentioning that they will not go after me for the deficiency. I tried to get the loss mitigation specialist to sign it but she claims she does everything electronically and that the approval is good the way it is.

I had bad experience when I reached a settlement with my second mortgage. After I wired them the money for the settlement amount, they still sent me to collections and they applied the settlement wire to the balance and kept asking for the remaining balance. I had to fax the “signed” approval letter to the debt collector as well as other departments that were not aware of it. I am worried the same thing will happen with the first mortgage after the shortsale goes through and they would still seek a deficiency judgment.

If it is not legally binding, then would her emailing me the unsigned approval letter be sufficient??

Anyhelp would be appreciated.

 

Following is the summary of a procedure that is widely and strongly recommended on another credit forum.  It is touted there as a very effective means to tie debt collectors in a legal knot, and force CA removal or violations in cases where the debt collector has reported to your CR.

It is called the “1-2 Punch.”  Debt validation in combination with a dispute to the CRA.

 

It works like this:

1. The consumer first sends a DV letter to the debt collector.  This letter is sent to invoke the “cease collection of the debt”  provisions of FDCPA 809(b).

2.  Immediately after that, the consumer is advised to send a dispute to the CRA under FCRA 611(a), with some unspecified allegation of inaccurate credit reporting.

 

This so-called 1-2 punch is supposed to tie the debt collector in knots.

It is predicated upon the assumption that, once the consumer sends a DV letter, the debt collector is then prevented from responding to the CRA in the parallel dispute process within the 30-day period set forth in FCRA 611(a) and 623(b).

The supposed dilemma for the debt collector is asserted to be:

If they respond to the CRA dispute, they are in violation of FDCPA 809(b).

If they don’t respond to the CRA dispute within 30-days, they must delete their CA reporting.

That is it.

 

I have questioned this process in their forum, opining that response to a legal FCRA requirement that they investigate and report back to the CRA on the dispute is not a “collection of the debt” activity, but rather a required action on their part under the FCRA.  The response I get from those in their forum is  “it works for us, so if you don’t like the process, just don’t use it!

 

Has anyone heard of, or used, such a process?  I reiterate that those on that forum are adamant about this process, and feel that it is legally supported.

 

I have a credit card that was sent to collections but the debt collector has not reported on my credit report. I want to get the balance off my original credit card but i do not want to risk calling the collection agency and getting a new collection account. What should i do since I want to have the original account to show up as paid but don’t want the collection agency to report to my credit report

 

Hi guys, 

 

I have been visiting these boards for the last few days, very informative. 

 

I just got a call from a debt collector on behalf of Dell Financial. They claim I owe Dell $615, which is true. 

 

Without agreeing that I owe the money, I offered a PFD just to get it off my credit report. The collection agent flat out refused stating that it was against their agreement with Dell to do that and in some states even against the law 

 

He stated that he could settle for a lower amount. I told him if the debt is mine, which I am not sure it is, I would like to pay it in full, not settle for a part of it. He said that was the policy take it or leave it. 

 

What should my next move be?

 

Thanks in advance. 

 

 

 

NCO financial sent me a letter of deletion  and also I received my dispute investigation letters from Equifax and transunion that NCO has been deleted as of April 12, 2010.

They have called my phone for me twice, they left me a voice mail message saying they are a debt collector blah blah blah, and they would like me to return their call about a settlement payment.Any ideas on how to stop this, it has been already deleted.