People need places to live, so if existing homes are not selling then it seems to me people are just renting more, changing jobs less, and possibly will invest more in home imporvement, so the ways money is spent and the beneficiaries may shift, but the net affect on the overall market would be negligible?

I can understand new home sales a bit better, but even then i would think that would affect mainly construction-related companies and mortgage finance related companies, not the broad market.

What relationships am i missing?

 

One percent of the people that live in the city, the households that file in the city pay something like 50% of the taxes. In a city that’s about 40,000 people so, you know, a handful left, any raise would make it revenue neutral. The question is, “What’s fair?” If one percent are paying 50% of the taxes, you want to make it even more? A little over half the people, half the households who file tax returns don’t pay any taxes. And about 30% of the households that file get a credit from the government. The government sends them a check. That’s the Earned Income Tax Credit.

Forty thousand people (he means families, I’m sure, but 40,000 people) outta eight million pay half the tax load in the city. Do you realize all it would take to kill that city is half of them leaving? If 20,000 of that 40,000 paying 50% of all taxes fled and decamped, do you know what would happen to New York? It would die. These people, these 40,000 people, they ought to be treated like royalty.

They ought to be thanked. They ought to be respected. Instead, they are impugned. They are maligned. They are trashed, as often a day as Democrats can do so. They are said to be the problem. That 40,000 people is who Obama is aiming at. Those 40,000 people is who back home thinks are responsible for the blight that exists throughout the rest of the city. Those 40,000 people, they make too much money. They have too much of a good time. They have taken all that wealth from the other 50% of the city. As such, we have to target them: the stimulus package, the mortgage bailout, what Rick Santelli was talking about. Atlas Shrugged! The people who are making this country work are the targets, and the people who are the losers, the people who are the slackers, are the beneficiaries.

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123500384765617949.html

 
I came across this site looking for something on family trust violations and was shocked at what I read. If this is true, I have a greater respect and curiosity for the Lear family, but also wonder if it could also be related to something a little more ‘out there’
 
 
” Trusts are formed and determined in equity and in due course equity must follow the law. The case of the Lear Family Trust shows how court appointed Trustees and lawyers manipulate the books and trust property while pitting family members beneficiaries against each other for their own self-serving ends. This created discord between beneficiaries is intended to preclude those who have right and interest from questioning the unethical and even fraudulent activities of the Trustees. It also shows how the judiciary can prejudicially favor the Trustees’ maladministration and breach of Trust while the beneficiaries are left wanting justice. “
 
“Trustees of other trusts have also acted in similar manners but these trusts are rarely the creation of someone as prominent as William P. Lear, Sr., the designer and inventor of the car radio, the 8-track tape, the automatic pilot and the Lear Jet to name only a few of his many achievements. Bill Lear obtained over 150 patents during his lifetime.”
 
 
” This sordid tale of dishonesty and influence is not over and litigation is still pending. The story extends far beyond one branch of the Nevada State government and its regulatory agencies. It is intertwined with federal agencies, international corporations, and dealings that defy the best of Hollywood’s imagination and involves a fortune of which few knew the true extent. “
 

Group wants Fund to probe $1M disbursed death claims
The Commonwealth Retirees Association wants the NMI Retirement Fund to review the contract between the agency and a former insurance carrier and about $1 million in death claims disbursed to beneficiaries.

Read more on Saipan Tribune

 


The agents are very interested in my family has sold life insurance, rather than the term of office. They said, life is a better term, because it has expired, is to ensure that the beneficiaries after the death of the insured person a portion of the money. However, because such an approach for the profits of insurance companies, if they are required to repay the amount at least equal to the total? I tried to do some research on my own, but I still can not fully understand the question. Any help would be greatly appreciated!

Page: /tag/beneficiaries/ :